Archive for the ‘Political’ Category

The Problem With School Closure

Monday, June 6th, 2011

I live in a rural small town community in Maine that is now facing a possible school closure. As was demonstrated at the meeting tonight, there is strong support for the elementary school. It is the only school in the town. The community members feel strongly that this school is a pillar of the community and that we should fight to keep it open.

The problem I see in the issue is the lack of tangible actions that can be taken to prevent the school closure. There is a set of rules, policies and procedures, but they do not allow the public of this town to truly exercise their views. Ultimately it is a board of directors for the district that will decide whether or not to keep the school open. Of this board of 11 communities each community is represented by one member. We have no exact way of preventing the board from closing the school even if every member of the community is willing to pitch in and find a way to keep it open.

I see a solution that I strongly believe is realistic, feasible, and simple enough to work. It is based on the commitment of each community to their school. Tonight, that commitment was shown to be strong and ready for action. Here’s the idea: before the board can vote to close a school, they must present the community with a list of budget shortfalls or specific needs that must be met in order to keep the school open. They must present a tangible list of needs and give the community a chance, as a whole, to come together and find a way to fulfill those needs. Further, they must justify why this particular community is being asked to produce an additional contribution if other communities are not asked to contribute in a similar way.

People are incredibly resourceful when they have to be. If there was a specific list of items that had to be addressed, I know that our town could do it. But there is not, nor is there required to be. The board of directors, of which our town is represented by only one member, can vote by two thirds majority to close the school.

Each member of the board is representing their own community. If the general feeling on the board is that a school must be closed, what will each board member be thinking during the vote? When it comes down to it, the choice is between our town, or the town they live in. Who would sacrifice their school for the school in another community? Once any school is singled out for evaluation for closure, the voting process predisposes a vote in favor of closing that school to save their own. That is, unless our board members have the courage to demand more resourcefulness and community resiliency.

Comments to Alan Grayson to Pass onto President Obama

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

I love Alan Grayson’s style. He has the attitude that I think has become necessary in this political climate, except he’s on the same side as I am on many issues. He’s the congressional representative of Florida’s 6th district. Yesterday he sent an email out looking for comments to pass on to President Obama. I drafted a little off the cuff litany of requests and sent it off. Who knows, maybe it was heard! Either way, it feels good to write down and express some of the frustrations I’ve had with our current political course.

Here’s what I sent:

Congressman Grayson,

Please tell President Obama that he needs to stop compromising with the Republicans because they won’t support him anyway. Compromising on good ideas like financial reform, climate legislation, and health care, just loses credibility and support within the voter base that elected him. Forget the corporate influence since you are the President. Lead us in direction of more true reforms that don’t make concessions to corporations. The media will attack you for this, but the people will support you.

End the wars now. We are losing our nations wealth in terms of human life and resources, and we are bringing devastation to the lives of families in Afghanistan and Iraq. These adventures are nothing more than imperialistic expeditions that funnel money into contractors and other companies that profit from defense spending. It has gone on long enough, we are not making any ‘progress’ and it needs to end.

Also, the gag order around reporters in the gulf region pertaining to oiled wildlife and containment booms is Orwellian and repugnant. I am glad that the President came out on the side of Religious freedom regarding the Islamic mosque at ground zero, but I think the infringement on first amendment rights in the gulf was atrocious. While we are on the topic of rights, how about reinstating habeas corpus?

Regarding energy, the support of nuclear energy is a really tremendously awful idea. The risks with nuclear are far too great. We should instead be providing these loan guarantees to developing off shore wind, for example. The oil catastrophe is a great moment to seize upon public disgust with our oil companies and move toward renewable energy sources. Just to be clear, clean coal is not one of these options.

Thank you Congressman Grayson for considering these few concerns off the top of my head.

New Jersey powered by Mountaintop Removal!

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010
I have heard a lot about the practice of mountaintop removal for coal mining.  Apparently this is the preferred method for extracting coal from the Appalachian mountain range.  It is an ongoing issue in West Virginia, with many people from the affected communities speaking out against the environmental devastation that it causes.  This video from Yale documents the positions of community members, scientists, coal industry executives, and even the West Virginia DEP.

Leveling Appalachia: The Legacy of Mountaintop Removal Mining

This video is shocking.  You’ll see just how much earth is exploded in a single blast.  You’ll also see the flat plateaus created at mountain top removal sites.  You’ll also hear the coal industry and DEP deny allegations of the environmental impacts and consequences.  I have to marvel at the greed and ignorance of this ‘industry’.   What could be more costly for future generations?  What could be less sustainable?  Will there be a point at which these people will finally admit the impact of their pollution?

So after watching this disturbing video, I thought to myself, what can I do about it?  It turns out that there are several sites that come up on a “mountaintop removal action” google search.  ”I love moutains” was one of the sites I visited today.  They really put the issue together nicely so that individuals can understand if they are some how tied into this issue.  You can check your power source by zip code, and see if your electricity is coming from a company that buys coal from mountaintop removal companies.  Our utility company happens to be PSE & G.  We also select their ‘green’ energy initiatives to support wind, solar, and bio-mass energy sources.  PSE&G offers a way of supporting those energy sources by paying an additional usage fee.  We’ve elected to use one of those options, but I digress.  The point is that the tool at ilovemountains.org told me that Jersey Central Power & Light buys coal from moutaintop removal companies.  They had attributed electricity in my zip code, 07063, as coming from Jersey Central Power & Light.  Here was the message:

“You are connected to mountaintop removal. Your electricity provider, Jersey Central Power Lt Co, buys coal from companies engaged in mountaintop removal”

You know, I guess that West Virginia really isn’t that far from here, but I’m still surprised that my power could be coming from West Virginia coal.  Perhaps I just have zero understanding of the coal & energy industry.  So I decided to check up on this power company:

Jersey Central Power & Light / First Energy

Judging by their coverage map, they do provide power in my area.  So am I not directly ‘guilty’ since my power comes from PSE&G?  Or does PSE&G also buy coal from mountaintop removal companies?  I’m sure that this question could be answered with a little digging.