Posts Tagged ‘political’

Truth In Media: IWF Health Insurance Message Rebuttal

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

I want to see truth in our media.  I fully support free speech, but I do not support the spread of deception and propaganda.  To the contrary, I will stand up and speak against it whenever I see it.  I will not stand by while my friends, family, and community members are deceived.  We need a greater standard of truth in this country.  We have let the media run amok, promoting thinly defensible ‘facts’ as truth.  I say no more!  It is time to demand better!

This is the story of what finally motivated me to speak up and take action:

Saturday night, while watching TV with my parents, I saw an ad that was placed by the Independent Women’s Forum (IWF.org).  Everything about the ad seemed wrong.  So wrong that it inspired me to do some online research into both the organization and into the ‘facts’ that they listed.  What I found was more shocking that I had anticipated.

Who is IWF?

It turns out that IWF is a group that, according to legal momentum, is anti-feminist.  Oddly, its chiefly staffed by women.  You can read legal momentum’s view on the IWF here:

http://www.legalmomentum.org/our-work/sfr/independent-womens-forum.html

Legal Momentum has close association to the National Organization for Women (NOW).

What was their deception?

In the ad, they focus on the issue of breast cancer treatment and survival rates and the main fraud is that they infer their own statistic and attribute it to the American Cancer Society.  FactCheck.org reports that the American Cancer Society has disavowed that claim:

http://factcheck.org/2009/09/a-false-appeal-to-womens-fears/

You’ll notice that the article posted at FactCheck.org is cited with actual comments from staff at the American Cancer Society.  I wonder if IWF ever thought to contact those individuals before making their claims?  Then there is the use of the breast cancer survival rate of England as a metric for determing the quality of future post-reform cancer care in the US.  The flaws in that logic are descibed fully (with citations) in an article from the Seminal Blog at FiredogLake.com:

http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/7278

Lastly, the ad cites the now infamous Lewin Group as “experts” in health insurance.  The Lewin Group is well known as an organization that is owned by one of the largest health insurers in the country, UnitedHealth Group.  Why would we trust statistics on the outcome of health insurance reform to be provided by ‘experts’ that are working for a health insurance company?  I think that the conflicts of interest there are too great in order to make their findings realiable or objective.

“Support the Consumer Financial Protection Agency” – A letter to my representative

Saturday, July 25th, 2009

I’ve sent the following letter to my representative Frank Pallone Jr. via email:

The people of the United States need an agency that is going to hold financial institutions accountable. We need protections to prevent companies from exploiting their customers through high interest rates and fees. We need strong protections to ensure that the ‘rules of the game’ are clear and simple for plain folks to understand. We also need to ensure that companies do not market products to people who cannot afford them.

For example, an credit card balance transfer offer should not be given if the 0% introductory rate changes to a very high rate at the first late payment. That is nothing but a trick. When the first payment is late, its only more likely that the next one will also be late. This is especially true if the next payment is required to be higher in amount because of the interest rate increase. This is but one example of why consumers need to be protected from the games that financial institutions have been allowed to play.

Please consider that the American people have cause to desire this kind of protection and that the financial institutions have demonstrated that their practices need to be formally and legally restricted.